Less than a month ago, the first DLC for Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla, Wrath of the Druids had its premiere . But officially, still little is known about the second expansion pack for the game. However, leaks from the Siege of Paris have just appeared on the web . Promises to be interesting!
This lack of any information about the upcoming DLC decided to change industry insider and Assassin’s Creed observer , j0nathan. On his YouTube channel, he shared with fans of the Ubisoft series the details that would come straight from the game files. We learn some interesting things from them.
First of all, we finally get to know the DLC description itself. It reads as follows:
In the south, the Kingdom of France was united under one king for the first time in a hundred years. Charles the Fat, great-grandson of Charlemagne, is now waging an unhurried battle against the Nords in France. England might be next. Raven’s Landing must find new allies to avoid the threat. The arrival of the newcomer at the docks of the settlement will start a new adventure.
Another issue is the timing of the action of the game, which is to take place a few years after the events of the base: in the year 885. Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla is estimated at 872-878 AD
But those who were hoping for the conflict between the Hidden and the Order of the Ancients to develop may be disappointed: there is no indication that the former will return in the upcoming DLC. Jonathan found only one line of dialogue related to them, possibly spoken by Eivor to a random person.
Finally, the user also announced that the premiere of the Siege of Paris can be expected on November 9 this year. However, he noted that this was only one of several possible dates. This would suggest, however, that the Season Pass for Assassin’s Creed Valhalla will be released before the latest expansion.
If you are interested in the source of this news, below is a video by j0nathan, in which he talks about everything:
So far, Ubisoft has not addressed these revelations and will probably not do so again. So it’s best to take this information with a grain of salt.